RE: Pet Lovers Thread
July 13, 2009 at 10:26 am
(This post was last modified: July 13, 2009 at 10:31 am by Rhizomorph13.)
(July 13, 2009 at 8:17 am)Dotard Wrote: Frodo,
What's the better choice? Keep an animal fed, cared for and breeding controlled or allow them to roam the streets breeding, tearing things up and becoming a human health hazard and 'round them up every once in awhile for gassing/burning?
False dilemma; there is a third choice where you do not keep pets AND you control their breeding habits.
I like pets though and agree that it is a bit of an arrogant act to keep them as is crafting metal into little boxes to travel in. Much of what we do as humans is arrogant and harmful to the environment. I say lets do it anyway because we can and let our governments control the externalities of such affairs while science works to lessen the effects of our acts.
Wheeeeeee,
Rhizo
(July 13, 2009 at 7:23 am)fr0d0 Wrote: Well domesticated pets are a perversion of nature born out of people's cruelty. I agree many wouldn't survive in a natural setting because they have no place in it. This disgusts me more than wants me to justify prolonged abuse. Just like it's probably be harmful to try to introduce a ferral child back into mainstream humanity.
Don't support the prolonged abuse of animals in the first place if you're truly an animal lover.
Fr0d0,
I agree with you that it is a perversion of nature but not born out of cruelty. It is born out of arrogance like much of our technology. As I said to Dotard, (I probably should have just made one post Doh!) much of what we do as a species makes no sense. I like keeping pets and my cat and two ferrets are happy.
Rhizo
