RE: Any Evidence For A Historical Jesus?
January 13, 2012 at 2:21 pm
(This post was last modified: January 13, 2012 at 3:00 pm by DeistPaladin.)
(January 13, 2012 at 1:05 pm)Minimalist Wrote: I'm impressed by one thing, chippy. You apparently have the ability to read with a total lack of comprehension.
I think you can forget about the other asshole. D-P exposed him for the Tektonics spouting jackass he is. He seems to have fled.
Is he one of Holding's boys? Figures. Doing the bait-and-switch seems common practice for them as they try to tilt the playing field as much as they can get away with.
(January 10, 2012 at 10:36 pm)Fpvpilot Wrote: I’m sorry if I upset you.
You didn't. I was simply commenting on your dishonesty.
Quote:I just wanted you to substantiate your assertions. That’s all. I will leave you alone now. Hopefully, as time permits in the coming months, we will be able to converse again.
You are still welcome to debate me on the historical Jesus and I will school you on what your own holy book says. You may be surprised.
Atheist Forums Hall of Shame:
"The trinity can be equated to having your cake and eating it too."
... -Lucent, trying to defend the Trinity concept
"(Yahweh's) actions are good because (Yahweh) is the ultimate standard of goodness. That’s not begging the question"
... -Statler Waldorf, Christian apologist
"The trinity can be equated to having your cake and eating it too."
... -Lucent, trying to defend the Trinity concept
"(Yahweh's) actions are good because (Yahweh) is the ultimate standard of goodness. That’s not begging the question"
... -Statler Waldorf, Christian apologist
