I don't find constructivism very appealing. What would a constructivist make of the following argument:
n = 2 if the Goldbach conjecture is true, 3 otherwise
Is n prime?
n = 2 if the Goldbach conjecture is true, 3 otherwise
Is n prime?
“The truth of our faith becomes a matter of ridicule among the infidels if any Catholic, not gifted with the necessary scientific learning, presents as dogma what scientific scrutiny shows to be false.”