RE: Book of Acts: Pure Fantasy
February 4, 2012 at 2:54 am
(This post was last modified: February 4, 2012 at 2:56 am by Phil.)
(February 4, 2012 at 2:31 am)genkaus Wrote:(February 4, 2012 at 1:48 am)brotherlylove Wrote: The Universe had a beginning, therefore it was caused by something. You have three choices
1 something from nothing
2 infinite regress of causes
3 an eternal first cause
The first two are logically incoherent. Not only this, but we know that time space energy and matter had a finite beginning, which means the cause of the Universe transcends all of those things. I think all of that, not withstanding the eternal first cause being the only coherent option, is evidence that points very powerfully to a transcendent Creator.
Your argument fails at its premise.
How do you know that the universe had a beginning?
Further the statement "time, space, energy and matter had a finite beginning" is self-refuting.
Looks to me like this christoholic needs to read Lawrence Krauss' new book A Universe from Nothing: Why There Is Something Rather than Nothing and a few Victor Stenger books not to mention the classic by Steven Weinberg The First Three Minutes: A Modern View Of The Origin Of The Universe. If he read them and understood them he would never try to use such idiotic arguments. But this guy has a really thick bozone layer so I'm not convinced those books can penetrate.
(February 4, 2012 at 2:54 am)brotherlylove Wrote:(February 4, 2012 at 2:48 am)Phil Wrote:(February 4, 2012 at 2:40 am)brotherlylove Wrote: I don't know anything about math, I simply have heard tell from people who do understand mathematics that it is really about how you define the number limit. In any case, if you do know anything about mathematics, can you demonstrate the inverse? If you can't, your proposition of 1 + 1 = 1.999 has no proof
That is obvious. I gave you the link to the wikipedia page about it that has many citations and everything your idiotic mind needs. BTW, learn to read cause I did not write 1.999, I wrote 1.999.........
So once again, fuck off.
Okay Phil. So, objective morality, do you think it exists or is it subjective?
I was speaking about truth so shove your morality bullshit up your ass. BTW, reread the last sentence you quoted then do it.