Book of Acts: Pure Fantasy

[Phil]

Correct, nothing does not exist as I keep telling you. You failed to show how you disagree with the statement nothing is unstable. Please do so or this conversation is over.

un·sta·ble (n-stbl)
adj. un·sta·bler, un·sta·blest
1.
a. Tending strongly to change: unstable weather.
b. Not constant; fluctuating: unstable vital signs.
2.
a. Fickle.
b. Lacking control of one's emotions; marked by unpredictable behavior.
3. Not firmly placed; unsteady: an unstable ladder.
4. Chemistry
a. Decomposing readily.
b. Highly or violently reactive.
5. Physics
a. Decaying with relatively short lifetime. Used of subatomic particles.
b. Radioactive.

Nothing cannot change, fluctuate, be fickle, unsteady, decompose, be reactive, have any physical properties, decay, or be radioactive. Nothing has no properties at all, therefore it cannot be unstable.

So now your claiming there is a possible nothing?! First off, recall how I told you to consider the Heisenberg Uncertainty Principle? That tells us that no two conjugate properties can be measured exactly. Your nothing has no matter which means you can measure it's density to an exact degree. The conjugate variable of density is pressure. Now when you claim there is no density, you can make no claim as to pressure (other than it is non-zero). Scientifically speaking there is no such thing as nothing and that is because nothing is unstable. You must have rode a short yellow bus if you actually think a dictionary definition is going to disprove anything in science. Another reason that has been proposed to show how nothing is unstable is that it considers the conjugate variables of empty space to be the energy density and the rate of change of the energy density. If the rate of change is zero (meaning nothing according to your definition) then the energy density must be non-zero. If the energy density is zero, the rate of change must be non-zero and there you have quantum fluctuations.

Any other education you need? Send a tuition check my way.