RE: 4 random arguements for atheism.
July 22, 2009 at 12:07 am
(This post was last modified: July 22, 2009 at 12:11 am by Ryft.)
(July 21, 2009 at 6:26 pm)Dotard Wrote: It was meant for the fence sitters and the Arcanuses, Frodos and their ilk. We have a couple fence sitters here which it may be new to or they never considered these arguements. The Frodos and Arcanuses may have heard them before but don't have a sufficient rebuttal. Or they may. I just haven't seen one where ever I posted these thoughts yet. ... I hoped Mr. Fancy-Words Arcanus might have a go at them.
As you may be aware, I have been heavily involved in a couple discussions elsewhere. And I don't like to spread myself too thin because I don't have indiscriminate amounts of leisure time for message boards, so I haven't been exploring the forums too far. But since a couple of those conversations are starting to wind down, I went exploring this afternoon—and discovered this post (including that other stellar one you published). I will oblige you and compose a rebuttal to all four arguments. Although given the amount of upcoming overtime at work, plus my ongoing work for Sirius XM and the remaining discussions I have committed to here... don't expect my response to be posted very soon. But I will definitely start composing one.
(P.S. If someone has an argument or something they want my thoughts on and a lot of time goes by without a word from me, I'm probably not even aware of it. So feel free to drop me a private message and bring it to my attention.)
Man is a rational animal who always loses his temper when
called upon to act in accordance with the dictates of reason.
(Oscar Wilde)
called upon to act in accordance with the dictates of reason.
(Oscar Wilde)
