4 random arguements for atheism.

[Purple Rabbit]

Nope! There is absolutely no evidence that thought can exist independent of it's supporting infrastructure (nerves/brain) and A LOT of evidence that damage to said infrastructure causes sometimes huge changes in thought/mind therefore it is absolutely reasonable to infer that mind/thought CANNOT exist without a supporting infrastructure and as such it is YOU that is making the extraordinary claim and YOU that must provide the extraordinary evidence.

I agree with you on this, Kyu. Confusing isn't it?

---

Dotard, you provide good arguments and are capable of expanding on them clearly. But to me the most important one is the moral fallacy. More than anything for me the abject moral inherent in given god concepts together with the claim of impeccable divine moral is the argument that invalidates these god concepts most. It shows severe inconsistencies of the kind 'A is not A'.