(February 11, 2012 at 5:39 am)brotherlylove Wrote: I never said all life anywhere, I said life here. Yes, there is a spiritual life, and physical life is empowered by spiritual life, otherwise you're just dealing with empty shells. You think the surface is the depth, staring dead into the veil. So, when I say life isn't possible otherwise, I will ammend it to mean, life as you generally understand it.
Then I would say - so fucking what? If the constants had been different, the life as we know it wouldn't have existed and maybe some other form of life would have. That is not evidence of fine-tuning. We are simply one of the possible consequences. Its arrogant to think that we were the objective all along.
(February 11, 2012 at 5:39 am)brotherlylove Wrote: You have faith in a self-creating Universe.
No I don't.
(February 11, 2012 at 5:39 am)brotherlylove Wrote: I don't believe Universes happen by themselves.
Me neither.
(February 11, 2012 at 5:39 am)brotherlylove Wrote: So, you actually do believe that nothing created everything, regardless of how you play with definitions.
Nope.
(February 11, 2012 at 5:39 am)brotherlylove Wrote: God could have created it in any given configuration, so therefore they are finely tuned.
If any configuration would have sufficeed and it just landed on this one, then it is arbitrarily tuned, not fine tuned.
(February 11, 2012 at 5:39 am)brotherlylove Wrote: How is the Universe timeless?
Because there cannot be any time outside the universe.
(February 11, 2012 at 5:39 am)brotherlylove Wrote: How did the Universe cause itself?
The universe did not cause itself - it is the efficient cause. Which means, it itself is causeless.
(February 11, 2012 at 5:39 am)brotherlylove Wrote: Something eternal by definition exists outside of time.
No. By definition, something eternal exists for all time, not outside time.
(February 11, 2012 at 5:39 am)brotherlylove Wrote: If you want to rehash this point, fine; Gods infinity is qualitative, not quantitative. It is referring to His superlative attributes, such as moral perfection, omnipotence, omnipresence, etc
Then why simply consider his lifespan to be exempt from this distinction? Special pleading?
(February 11, 2012 at 5:39 am)brotherlylove Wrote: In that particular instance he was talking about potential infinities. Obviously you can't add anything to an actual infinity, can you?
Ofcourse you can. Potential infinites of mind are actual infinites of physical reality.
(February 11, 2012 at 5:39 am)brotherlylove Wrote: If you don't have an actually infinite amount of things, you are dealing with a finite number. A potential infinite is *potentially infinite* not *actually infinite*
Duh. We do have infinite amount of things. They are referred to as potential infinites because we haven't finished counting them - obviously.