RE: A Scientific Basis for Spirit
February 11, 2012 at 8:44 pm
(This post was last modified: February 11, 2012 at 8:47 pm by Cyberman.)
Yet you proposed it as a scientific basis for what you define as spirit. One of the key features of science is that the experiments not only must be repeatable by everyone but the conclusions resulting from those experiments must be observable as well. The whole point of experiments is to eliminate ambiguity. It's no good my performing your experiment and getting a totally different result, because it proves nothing.
(ETA: Incidentally, another key part of the scientific method is peer review, in which your experiments and conclusions are tested to destruction. This in diluted form is what you're experiencing now.)
(ETA: Incidentally, another key part of the scientific method is peer review, in which your experiments and conclusions are tested to destruction. This in diluted form is what you're experiencing now.)
At the age of five, Skagra decided emphatically that God did not exist. This revelation tends to make most people in the universe who have it react in one of two ways - with relief or with despair. Only Skagra responded to it by thinking, 'Wait a second. That means there's a situation vacant.'
