RE: Richard Dawkins: I can't be sure God does not exist
February 25, 2012 at 5:16 am
(This post was last modified: February 25, 2012 at 5:18 am by Welsh cake.)
I can be sure God does not exist because the word "God" is meaningless, the attributes are nonsensical, its outdated, and the concept is incoherent as no two theists have the same vision in mind or archetype regarding the god's behaviour or relationships with 'creation'. Could a higher intelligence or unknown being be responsible for creating reality? I'm open-minded to the speculation, but that doesn't necessarily mean its a "deity" that operates on "magic".
If we discover a semblance of a "god" it most probably will be an alien life-form of some sort.
[/Trekkie hat off]
To be honest forget the whole 'debate' or the media quoting someone out of context as usual. Its that bloody Baroness Warsi, the Tory party chairman, whose unchecked comments on secularism that truly disgusts me here.
If politicians are going to throw around asinine terms such as "militant secularism" (wtf does that even mean Warsi?) then I can forsee England is going holding back the rest of the UK... for a very long time.
If we discover a semblance of a "god" it most probably will be an alien life-form of some sort.
[/Trekkie hat off]
To be honest forget the whole 'debate' or the media quoting someone out of context as usual. Its that bloody Baroness Warsi, the Tory party chairman, whose unchecked comments on secularism that truly disgusts me here.
If politicians are going to throw around asinine terms such as "militant secularism" (wtf does that even mean Warsi?) then I can forsee England is going holding back the rest of the UK... for a very long time.
