Very good points, but too much reliance on genetic coding for morality. There is far too much social conditioning to ignore.
Its a combination of both in my view, but more heavily weighted towards social conditioning. Successful societies will propagate, and this relies on moral imperatives to ensure the success of the society as a whole.
As a general rule this involves those of an equivalent genetic similarities will form societies so we shouldn't consider genetics as the prime mover in terms of morality imo.
I'm drunk thou, so I may be wrong or badly illiterate
Its a combination of both in my view, but more heavily weighted towards social conditioning. Successful societies will propagate, and this relies on moral imperatives to ensure the success of the society as a whole.
As a general rule this involves those of an equivalent genetic similarities will form societies so we shouldn't consider genetics as the prime mover in terms of morality imo.
I'm drunk thou, so I may be wrong or badly illiterate

Self-authenticating private evidence is useless, because it is indistinguishable from the illusion of it. ― Kel, Kelosophy Blog
If you’re going to watch tele, you should watch Scooby Doo. That show was so cool because every time there’s a church with a ghoul, or a ghost in a school. They looked beneath the mask and what was inside?
The f**king janitor or the dude who runs the waterslide. Throughout history every mystery. Ever solved has turned out to be. Not Magic. ― Tim Minchin, Storm
If you’re going to watch tele, you should watch Scooby Doo. That show was so cool because every time there’s a church with a ghoul, or a ghost in a school. They looked beneath the mask and what was inside?
The f**king janitor or the dude who runs the waterslide. Throughout history every mystery. Ever solved has turned out to be. Not Magic. ― Tim Minchin, Storm