RE: Berkeley's Idealism
March 15, 2012 at 2:17 pm
(This post was last modified: March 15, 2012 at 2:40 pm by The Grand Nudger.)
I'm referring more towards what must be done after the argument appears to be both valid and sound. Some connection must still be drawn, must it not?
(LATE EDIT) What I'm trying to express here, is that whether or not an argument is internally consistent is all well and good. It's more important to me, personally, that the argument be consistent with more than just itself.
(LATE EDIT) What I'm trying to express here, is that whether or not an argument is internally consistent is all well and good. It's more important to me, personally, that the argument be consistent with more than just itself.
I am the Infantry. I am my country’s strength in war, her deterrent in peace. I am the heart of the fight… wherever, whenever. I carry America’s faith and honor against her enemies. I am the Queen of Battle. I am what my country expects me to be, the best trained Soldier in the world. In the race for victory, I am swift, determined, and courageous, armed with a fierce will to win. Never will I fail my country’s trust. Always I fight on…through the foe, to the objective, to triumph overall. If necessary, I will fight to my death. By my steadfast courage, I have won more than 200 years of freedom. I yield not to weakness, to hunger, to cowardice, to fatigue, to superior odds, For I am mentally tough, physically strong, and morally straight. I forsake not, my country, my mission, my comrades, my sacred duty. I am relentless. I am always there, now and forever. I AM THE INFANTRY! FOLLOW ME!
