RE: Thoughts on Buddhism
March 16, 2012 at 5:40 am
(This post was last modified: March 16, 2012 at 5:44 am by Carnavon.)
(March 12, 2012 at 4:15 pm)Rhythm Wrote: Tyre is a joke,Then you would humor me with a brief summary of why you hold such a view?
Quote: Prophecies actually have to come true, otherwise we call that "bullshit".Exactly. Making one or two prophecies where the facts are later "manipulated" to suit your prophecy is one thing. To have a phletora of prophecies that are fulfilled, is a totally different kettle of fish to an objective observer. But based on the lack of proper argument, I must come to the conclusion that your opposition is not based on fact but an emotional response.
Quote: Unfortunately, we still have to wait for this prophecy to come true, and when it has, we'll have to wait for "never" to come before we can call it fulfilled. Bad show on the prophesizers part, wrecking his own shit so thoroughly.What we can say is that it is still true –it is undivided. It has not been broken. Thus – you cannot prove it wrong, but I can prove it is still true.
Quote:Last I checked, Egpyt was still here, still a nation, still ruling.Last I checked, the quote was "I will make it so weak that it will never again rule over the nations". See the difference?
Quote:Christ, Babylon and Judah, these are your demonstrations?You are welcome to provide any evidence that what has been recorded in the Bible has ever been proven wrong. Never.
First, establish that this shit happened, then establish the dates for the prophecies. Kind of has to be prophesied in advance.
Prophecy remains complete garbage. All you've established is that you, personally, have swallowed the koolaid, and believe in hocus pocus. Don't talk to me about facts after posting a screed about your beliefs.
"The excessive skepticism shown toward the Bible by important historical schools... has been progressively discredited. Discovery after discovery has established the accuracy of innumerable details, and has brought increased recognition to the value of the Bible as a source of history.
So Rhythm my dear boy, my source is increasingly proven correct where its detractors have to submit to defeat.
Based on these facts, you are somehow supporting the wrong team - and confirming my suspicion that your retorts are not the result of in-depth study.
You could learn a thing or two from Acracadabra - he at least put forward some form of argument.
apophenia , my mistake. Sorry