(August 11, 2009 at 7:50 pm)Tiberius Wrote: I agree with statement (1), but (2) is a non-sequitur. It is an assumption and simply does not follow through. In fact I'm a little bit disappointed by this argument, given that Arcanus sticks by it so strongly. The argument itself gives nothing to explain (2), it just states it.
Brace yourself. It's a coming.