Conversion

[Eilonnwy]

Well if 'it' exists regardless of the human awareness and limits of human experience. Then how can you know 'it' exists? Where's the evidence that it does?

Regardless of human errors and limitations in acknowledging specific principles. As Arcanus said, it is not a theory of ethics, or of logic, but of metaethics and metalogic, that is, the origin of the conceptual reality of logical order at all, not the specific principles.

*sigh* TAG. It's not logically sound, because it assumes that you have to have a consciousness in order for logical absolutes to exist, therefore bam, there's god, the ultimate consciousness. Which is bullshit, because you have to prove a consciousness has to exist for logical absolutes to exists. And TAG doesn't prove that, so it's out the window.

BUT, even if you could prove God exists with TAG, you CANNOT get to the Christian God, because you essentially prove ANY god with it and any god is not the Christian god.