Jon, your metalogic and metaethics are bullshit. You can't prove anything you just said empirically through the scientific method, thus you don't meet my requirements. You make assertions, and you can't prove anything by making assertions. You have the burden of proof and fail to meet it at every turn.
Besides all that, you say god is omnipotent, can he create a rock that even he can't lift? Your descriptions of god are, by nature, contradictory. (In other words, not possible)
You claim these qualities describe a Christian god, but that, once again, is your assertion. Other gods mentioned here are described to have the same exact qualities. Stop. Making. Assertions. Provide some actually fucking proof.
BTW, as a side note, even if you could prove the Christian god empirically, that doesn't mean I would worship him. I would never worship a god that condones murder and slavery. I would never worship a god that continues to watch people suffer in poverty and does nothing. That's an evil god.
Besides all that, you say god is omnipotent, can he create a rock that even he can't lift? Your descriptions of god are, by nature, contradictory. (In other words, not possible)
You claim these qualities describe a Christian god, but that, once again, is your assertion. Other gods mentioned here are described to have the same exact qualities. Stop. Making. Assertions. Provide some actually fucking proof.
BTW, as a side note, even if you could prove the Christian god empirically, that doesn't mean I would worship him. I would never worship a god that condones murder and slavery. I would never worship a god that continues to watch people suffer in poverty and does nothing. That's an evil god.
"The way to see by faith is to shut the eye of reason." Benjamin Franklin
::Blogs:: Boston Atheism Examiner - Boston Atheists Blog | :odcast:: Boston Atheists Report
::Blogs:: Boston Atheism Examiner - Boston Atheists Blog | :odcast:: Boston Atheists Report