(April 8, 2012 at 8:23 pm)Faith No More Wrote:What were the implication of Epicurus' idea of a god who would not stop evil?Drich Wrote:Therefore it can be said not only is God not willing to stop evil He made allowances for it.
Which is exactly the essence of the quote you are trying to refute. You cannot have your cake and eat it too.
What are the implications of God of the bible's purpose of evil?
Do you see a contrast? The result may have been the same but the conclusion or understanding of evil places the Epicurean Paradox in peril.
(Oooo What a nice cake! MMMM It tastes good too
