Evolution and Blood

[elunico13]

Oh, my....irreducible complexity AGAIN!

Irreducible complexity (IC) is an argument by proponents of intelligent design that certain biological systems are too complex to have evolved from simpler, or "less complete" predecessors, through natural selection acting upon a series of advantageous naturally occurring, chance mutations.[1] The argument is central to intelligent design, and is rejected by the scientific community at large,[2] which overwhelmingly regards intelligent design as pseudoscience.[

Thanks for your Wikipedia reference LOL! Kenneth R. Miller uses a high school experience of a mousetrap used to launch spit wads as an argument. Wiki also says evolutionists don't have a "complete" argument about irreducible complexity (not surprised), and that coagulation is absent in whales therefore not needed to sustain life. Don't forget what Tobie said about the bumble bees. Those are definitely needed for life on Earth.

I took the time to read it anyway since you presented it to defend your faith.

---

What we have here is someone that thinks of "Evolution" as the "Atheist's Alternative Explanation"... and that it is used in place of "Goddidit". This upsets him (emotionally) and so he sets out to poke holes in what he thinks evolution means. He is desperately trying to find something, anything, that proves evolution wrong, so he can go back to feeling comfortable with his fairy tales. It's quite sad, really.

There I go... posting about emotions again. I keep forgetting that, as someone that lacks belief in fairy tales, I'm not supposed to have any.

Don't forget about all the arbitrary statements.