(April 13, 2012 at 11:24 am)genkaus Wrote: We all have heard theists argue over and over again that "you can't prove god doesn't exist". So, I'll ask this question - what evidence do you require to prove his non-existence?
Don't actually need to disprove god's existence if god hasn't even been demonstrated to exist yet. Yeah, we can't prove god doesn't exist, but neither can they prove that there is no tea pot orbiting the sun, or that there's an invisible dragon in my garage, ect ect. No need to disprove something that has no evidence to support it's existence to begin with.
Just rule it out as unsupported nonsense. If they don't like that, tough! God is just a belief with zero evidence to support it. Also it's infallible, has no value or explanatory power, no credibility.
Just rule it out.
[Washes hands] That's all that there is to it.
Extraordinary claims require extraordinary evidence - Carl Sagan
Mankind's intelligence walks hand in hand with it's stupidity.
Being an atheist says nothing about your overall intelligence, it just means you don't believe in god. Atheists can be as bright as any scientist and as stupid as any creationist.
You never really know just how stupid someone is, until you've argued with them.
Mankind's intelligence walks hand in hand with it's stupidity.
Being an atheist says nothing about your overall intelligence, it just means you don't believe in god. Atheists can be as bright as any scientist and as stupid as any creationist.
You never really know just how stupid someone is, until you've argued with them.
