How is it that a group of people who supposedly do not believe in God, have ascribed or adopted these religious terms?
secondly why is it that you all seem to insist in these baseless descriptions when confronted by the absences of these terms in the bible?
Lastly If you are speaking of the God of the bible then are you not bound by what the bible describes as God? again so why insist on non biblical terms to describe God? Are your arguments so dependent on these terms you can not deviate or have you simply not been taught how to think of God outside of these 'religious' terms?
In one of my other threads some of you keep returning to the dry well of the omni aspects of God as if your understanding of God some how trumps the biblical understanding/definitions of God. How does that work exactly? You who claim their is no God, some how has a deeper understanding of God than the bible or those who commit their lives studying it.
secondly why is it that you all seem to insist in these baseless descriptions when confronted by the absences of these terms in the bible?
Lastly If you are speaking of the God of the bible then are you not bound by what the bible describes as God? again so why insist on non biblical terms to describe God? Are your arguments so dependent on these terms you can not deviate or have you simply not been taught how to think of God outside of these 'religious' terms?
In one of my other threads some of you keep returning to the dry well of the omni aspects of God as if your understanding of God some how trumps the biblical understanding/definitions of God. How does that work exactly? You who claim their is no God, some how has a deeper understanding of God than the bible or those who commit their lives studying it.
