(April 17, 2012 at 3:45 am)Abishalom Wrote:(April 16, 2012 at 11:25 pm)RaphielDrake Wrote:(April 16, 2012 at 11:04 pm)Abishalom Wrote: If all we can see is the natural world, then how does our knowledge of the natural world prove that God does not exists? Evidence does not actually talk to you. It depends on your worldview on how you perceive the evidence. But you have to rationalize heavily to come to conclusion that with all the complexities and intricacies (to the minute details) we see around us suggests that God did not do all this. Just my 2 cents.
Fair enough, show us some supernatural evidence. :-)
What is supernatural evidence? All we have is natural evidence and it suggests that it was created by some higher power (God). The burden of proof lies on the prosecutor who has to prove beyond reasonable doubt guilty/nonexistence. So in other words to claim that God does not exists you would to possess all possible evidence (we do not have). So the best you could do is prove that all the natural evidence we have suggests nonexistence unanimously without a hint (reasonable doubt) that God did it.
It is not man that seeks god through science but god that seeks man throughtout history i.e. religions.
Have a lurk around the forum for the reasons why god hasn't shown itself to us.
"It is the mark of an educated mind to be able to entertain a thought without accepting it" ~ Aristotle
