RE: Evidence Against God
April 17, 2012 at 1:04 pm
(This post was last modified: April 17, 2012 at 1:07 pm by genkaus.)
(April 16, 2012 at 11:04 pm)Abishalom Wrote: If all we can see is the natural world, then how does our knowledge of the natural world prove that God does not exists? Evidence does not actually talk to you. It depends on your worldview on how you perceive the evidence. But you have to rationalize heavily to come to conclusion that with all the complexities and intricacies (to the minute details) we see around us suggests that God did not do all this. Just my 2 cents.
So what you are saying is that no evidence would ever convince you that god does not exist? Way to be close-minded.
(April 17, 2012 at 3:45 am)Abishalom Wrote: What is supernatural evidence? All we have is natural evidence and it suggests that it was created by some higher power (God). The burden of proof lies on the prosecutor who has to prove beyond reasonable doubt guilty/nonexistence. So in other words to claim that God does not exists you would to possess all possible evidence (we do not have). So the best you could do is prove that all the natural evidence we have suggests nonexistence unanimously without a hint (reasonable doubt) that God did it.
You are changing your position here. According to your previous post, whether natural evidence points to god is a matter of perspective and therefore useless.
