RE: Evidence Against God
April 17, 2012 at 1:43 pm
(This post was last modified: April 17, 2012 at 2:20 pm by Abishalom.)
(April 17, 2012 at 1:39 pm)Paul the Human Wrote:(April 17, 2012 at 1:33 pm)Abishalom Wrote: Did you read the WHOLE article or did you just choose 1 sentence to make up a lie?
Don't you call me a liar. That 'science' that you are talking about, as I already said, has nothing to with gods and everything to do with the brain's coping mechanism concerning the unknown. It is man that installs the concept of gods. The science only shows a predisposition to believe in the unfounded and supernatural when the truth is yet to be explained.
Read it with less of a bias and you will see. Now I am done with you. You've pissed me off.
Where did I call you a liar? If the shoe fits... Anyway, I said don't fragment 1 sentence to make up a lie (whether it was purposeful or not) that the article claimed the predisposition is just coping mechanism. It shows bias on you part, because you ignored my purpose for even posting the article. I'm not trying to prove God to you. Jaysyn claimed that atheism was the default position of babies. Obviously he was wrong. The articles did shine light on the FACT that babies are PREDISPOSED to believing in a higher power, that things have a PURPOSE, and in life after death (you know this things you "forgot" to mention in that one sentence you quoted). Not the atheists position.
