(April 17, 2012 at 1:14 pm)Abishalom Wrote: I said no such thing. I said the evidence does not actually speak to you, so therefore it would depend on your worldview on how you would perceive the evidence. You might be thinking too hard.
I asked you what evidence you'd need to prove to you that god does not exist. You didn't address the question. What you did say was that whether or not some evidence is perceived to be against god would depend upon your established world-view. Since I assume that your world-view is based on god, then no evidence that can ever be shown to you could be perceived against god.
If I'm wrong, then all you need to do is tell me what evidence you would require as proof against god's existence?
(April 17, 2012 at 1:14 pm)Abishalom Wrote: Please provide the logic for this conclusion. If you actually read my post you will realize I did no such thing.
Read it yourself. You've repeated it here as well. You said, "it would depend on your worldview on how you would perceive the evidence". Which means that with different world-views, same evidence would be proof for different and probably contradictory things. Therefore, useless.
