(April 17, 2012 at 2:08 pm)Abishalom Wrote: Ok. Well obviously to definitively prove that God does not exist we would need all possible evidence. Which we do not possess. Therefore, we cannot definitively prove this. So what we can do is evaluate all the known evidence. You would have to prove unanimously that all the known evidence points to no God. I guess a start would be prove that the universe and everything in it had no beginning.
Well, then, I guess you should be an atheist once you study up on big-bang cosmology, according to which, time and space exist only within the context of this universe and therefore the term "beginning of the universe" makes no sense.
(April 17, 2012 at 2:08 pm)Abishalom Wrote: Yes I did say that, but I asked for the logic of your conclusion (you said I changed my position).
You said this and later on you said that natural evidence points to god. This is the change in your position I'm talking about.
(April 17, 2012 at 2:08 pm)Abishalom Wrote: Anyway...Don't you see that now? Did you know that when it comes to the origin theories they are diametrically opposed (mutually exclusive) to the biblical account. So you have to ask yourself an honest question. Why do these theories on origin (evolution, big bang, abiogenisis, ones concerning the order of the formation of stars and planets etc) have an EXACT opposite account on the beginnings from the biblical account?
I don't have to ask myself - I already know the answer. The biblical account is a lie.