Evidence Against God

[Abishalom]

Let's examine my original quote...
"If all we can see is the natural world, then how does our knowledge of the natural world prove that God does not exists?"
From this statement I only implied 2 things 2 things. All we can see is the natural world and we have knowledge of the natural world.

It isn't an assumption if you repeatedly make assertions we live in a universe where a God exists based on the fact nature exists yet cry out "oh we don't knows thats all there is" when we point out various things in nature that go against the theory of intelligent design.
You're picking and choosing what can and can't be used in a debate based on your own severely biased preferences and its ridiculous.
[/quote]

First of all I haven't written anything along those lines...

I asked one simple question. You dissected it into baseless assumptions, all while IGNORING my question.

"If all we can see is the natural world, then how does our knowledge of the natural world prove that God does not exists?"

It's simple. Either answer my question or leave it be.