Evidence Against God

[Reforged]

It isn't an assumption if you repeatedly make assertions we live in a universe where a God exists based on the fact nature exists yet cry out "oh we don't knows thats all there is" when we point out various things in nature that go against the theory of intelligent design.
You're picking and choosing what can and can't be used in a debate based on your own severely biased preferences and its ridiculous.

First of all I haven't written anything along those lines...

I asked one simple question. You dissected it into baseless assumptions, all while IGNORING my question.

"If all we can see is the natural world, then how does our knowledge of the natural world prove that God does not exists?"

It's simple. Either answer my question or leave it be.
[/quote]


Firstly, yes you have and secondly you didn't ask me that question but I've sure as hell been waiting for it:
Have you ever looked at the human respiratory system? Its horribly inefficient and flawed, it gets a fraction the amount of oxygen out of air thats possible. Thats why you could breathe in and out of a paper bag for quite sometime, because what you breathe out still has alot of oxygen in it.
Yet according to religious texts God is an omnipotent, perfect being... and we are "made in his image". Thats clearly not the case otherwise these obvious flaws wouldn't be there.
The only plausible realization someone can come to is that the entire concept is complete bullshit.
I've got plenty more examples if you'd like. :-)