(August 22, 2009 at 12:10 pm)Darwinian Wrote: This is a very wierd sort of logic. As far as I can make out you are arguing that because there are things that defy human understanding it therefore follows that there must be a higher power.
But how can you come to this conclusion if the understanding and the ability to deduce a higher power is beyond our understanding?
It's basically the logical fallacy of The Argument from Personal Incredulity.
"I can't imagine how any of this would work without a creator...therefore: Goddidit".
EvD