Our server costs ~$56 per month to run. Please consider donating or becoming a Patron to help keep the site running. Help us gain new members by following us on Twitter and liking our page on Facebook!
Current time: December 28, 2024, 12:03 pm
Atheist Forums › Discussion › Off Topic v
Star Trek Science

Thread Rating:
  • 0 Vote(s) - 0 Average
  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
Thread Modes
Star Trek Science
Kyuuketsuki Offline
Retired Staff
*****
Religious Views: Atheist
Posts: 2721
Threads: 99
Joined: October 8, 2008
Reputation: 17
#10
RE: Star Trek Science
August 22, 2009 at 2:44 pm
(August 22, 2009 at 3:39 am)Darwinian Wrote: If you had your own holodeck, what would you do with it?

I'd be an irresistible vampire having my wicked way with, and subsequently drinking the blood of, young virgins ... of course only the really pretty Gothic ones would survive and obviously I would cut a bloody swathe through Christendom Smile

Kyu
Angry Atheism
Where those who are hacked off with the stupidity of irrational belief can vent their feelings!
Come over to the dark side, we have cookies!

Kyuuketsuki, AngryAtheism Owner & Administrator
Find
Reply


Atheist Forums › Discussion › Off Topic v
Star Trek Science

Messages In This Thread
Star Trek Science - by Darwinian - August 22, 2009 at 3:39 am
RE: Star Trek Science - by Retorth - August 22, 2009 at 3:45 am
RE: Star Trek Science - by Dotard - August 22, 2009 at 7:53 am
RE: Star Trek Science - by RevOxley - August 22, 2009 at 10:34 am
RE: Star Trek Science - by Tiberius - August 22, 2009 at 10:39 am
RE: Star Trek Science - by Retorth - August 22, 2009 at 10:52 am
RE: Star Trek Science - by Edwardo Piet - August 22, 2009 at 11:39 am
RE: Star Trek Science - by Rhizomorph13 - August 22, 2009 at 12:09 pm
RE: Star Trek Science - by binny - August 22, 2009 at 2:32 pm
RE: Star Trek Science - by Kyuuketsuki - August 22, 2009 at 2:44 pm
RE: Star Trek Science - by Tiberius - August 22, 2009 at 3:11 pm
RE: Star Trek Science - by fr0d0 - August 22, 2009 at 3:21 pm
RE: Star Trek Science - by Rhizomorph13 - August 23, 2009 at 2:06 pm
RE: Star Trek Science - by Darwinian - August 23, 2009 at 2:07 pm
RE: Star Trek Science - by binny - August 23, 2009 at 6:22 pm
RE: Star Trek Science - by fr0d0 - August 23, 2009 at 6:24 pm
RE: Star Trek Science - by binny - August 24, 2009 at 11:30 am
RE: Star Trek Science - by fr0d0 - August 24, 2009 at 1:39 pm
RE: Star Trek Science - by Rob - August 22, 2009 at 3:28 pm
RE: Star Trek Science - by Tiberius - August 22, 2009 at 3:30 pm
RE: Star Trek Science - by fr0d0 - August 22, 2009 at 3:39 pm
RE: Star Trek Science - by Tiberius - August 22, 2009 at 5:58 pm
RE: Star Trek Science - by Edwardo Piet - August 22, 2009 at 6:00 pm
RE: Star Trek Science - by Dotard - August 23, 2009 at 12:02 am
RE: Star Trek Science - by Rob - August 23, 2009 at 10:01 am
RE: Star Trek Science - by Rhizomorph13 - August 23, 2009 at 2:12 pm
RE: Star Trek Science - by Edwardo Piet - August 23, 2009 at 10:02 am
RE: Star Trek Science - by Kyuuketsuki - August 23, 2009 at 10:48 am
RE: Star Trek Science - by Edwardo Piet - August 23, 2009 at 1:04 pm
RE: Star Trek Science - by binny - August 23, 2009 at 1:06 pm
RE: Star Trek Science - by Darwinian - August 23, 2009 at 1:08 pm
RE: Star Trek Science - by Edwardo Piet - August 23, 2009 at 1:09 pm
RE: Star Trek Science - by Dotard - August 23, 2009 at 1:44 pm
RE: Star Trek Science - by Darwinian - August 23, 2009 at 1:45 pm
RE: Star Trek Science - by Edwardo Piet - August 23, 2009 at 6:12 pm
RE: Star Trek Science - by Dotard - August 23, 2009 at 6:38 pm
RE: Star Trek Science - by Edwardo Piet - August 23, 2009 at 6:41 pm
RE: Star Trek Science - by Dotard - August 24, 2009 at 6:16 pm
RE: Star Trek Science - by lilphil1989 - August 26, 2009 at 4:48 am
RE: Star Trek Science - by lilphil1989 - October 5, 2009 at 8:01 am
RE: Star Trek Science - by fr0d0 - October 5, 2009 at 9:24 am
RE: Star Trek Science - by Amphora - October 5, 2009 at 1:40 pm
RE: Star Trek Science - by theblindferrengi - October 5, 2009 at 7:59 pm
RE: Star Trek Science - by binny - October 5, 2009 at 8:02 pm
RE: Star Trek Science - by Dotard - October 6, 2009 at 6:08 am
RE: Star Trek Science - by fr0d0 - October 5, 2009 at 8:22 pm
RE: Star Trek Science - by theblindferrengi - October 5, 2009 at 10:43 pm
RE: Star Trek Science - by fr0d0 - October 6, 2009 at 6:55 am
RE: Star Trek Science - by binny - October 6, 2009 at 11:08 am

Possibly Related Threads...
Thread Author Replies Views Last Post
  Charles Bronson movie star Woah0 9 1149 September 12, 2022 at 10:25 pm
Last Post: onlinebiker
  Happy Star Wars Day onlinebiker 7 628 May 5, 2022 at 9:31 pm
Last Post: brewer
  Happy Star Wars Day onlinebiker 7 1068 May 4, 2020 at 1:39 pm
Last Post: Duty
  Super Heroes, Star Wars and Star Trek is the worst entertainment made in US history Sanau 18 2259 March 30, 2020 at 12:40 pm
Last Post: Gawdzilla Sama
Wink Star Wars plot holes? Wash your mouth out! ignoramus 3 664 May 23, 2019 at 9:43 pm
Last Post: Chad32
  Have a Stellar Star Wars Day onlinebiker 44 4089 May 5, 2019 at 11:02 am
Last Post: Nakara
  Star Trek Discovery Season 2 is Good Mechaghostman2 28 4475 March 25, 2019 at 12:14 am
Last Post: The Valkyrie
  10 things you didn’t know about Star Wars robvalue 3 1050 March 20, 2019 at 7:13 am
Last Post: Yonadav
  Star Wars fan film: Darth Vader: Episode 1 Shards ofthe Past Cepheus Ace 5 706 December 23, 2018 at 3:14 am
Last Post: Maketakunai
  What's your longest trek? Gawdzilla Sama 39 3668 June 28, 2018 at 1:24 am
Last Post: Whateverist



Users browsing this thread: 11 Guest(s)