(April 23, 2012 at 6:08 pm)Phil Wrote:(April 23, 2012 at 5:28 pm)orogenicman Wrote: Of course, you didn't answer my question, neither here nor in the OP. So my question stands. How is spontaneous emission of an electron or a positro tn evidence of an uncaused cause?
Of course I didn't answer your question because if you fucking read the OP you would see what was said was between type II and type III. You are asking about type I and type II which was not what was said. If you didn't read the OP why should i waste my time with your stupidity?
And once again, Goggle isn't science nor is a single source science. You can read all over the fucking internet that there are three types of beta decay.
Tell you what, either read the OP or you are going on ignore. Ask your asinine question about type I and type II once again and you go on ignore, deal?
edit: On second thought, after rereading your response to Google isn't science you are going on ignore.
In fact, I read your OP carefully, Phil, and it is clear that you don't understand beta decay. There is no such thing as "Type II and type III" beta decay. There are only two types of beta decay, and those are beta minus and beta plus (ß- and ß+), which involve electron emisson or positron emission, respectively. And the emission is spontaneous. So once again, how is spontaneous emission involved in beta decay (which is the only type of emission there can be in beta decay) evidence of "uncaused cause"?
'The difference between a Miracle and a Fact is exactly the difference between a mermaid and seal. It could not be expressed better.'
-- Samuel "Mark Twain" Clemens
"I think that in the discussion of natural problems we ought to begin not with the scriptures, but with experiments, demonstrations, and observations".
- Galileo Galilei (1564-1642)
"In short, Meyer has shown that his first disastrous book was not a fluke: he is capable of going into any field in which he has no training or research experience and botching it just as badly as he did molecular biology. As I've written before, if you are a complete amateur and don't understand a subject, don't demonstrate the Dunning-Kruger effect by writing a book about it and proving your ignorance to everyone else! "
- Dr. Donald Prothero
-- Samuel "Mark Twain" Clemens
"I think that in the discussion of natural problems we ought to begin not with the scriptures, but with experiments, demonstrations, and observations".
- Galileo Galilei (1564-1642)
"In short, Meyer has shown that his first disastrous book was not a fluke: he is capable of going into any field in which he has no training or research experience and botching it just as badly as he did molecular biology. As I've written before, if you are a complete amateur and don't understand a subject, don't demonstrate the Dunning-Kruger effect by writing a book about it and proving your ignorance to everyone else! "
- Dr. Donald Prothero
