|
Star Trek Science
|
Dotard
Card carrying member of NO MA'AM  Religious Views: Asuperstitionist. Silly theists, myths are for kids!
Sure you would. Most you dudes are saying the majority use would be other things, but just like your internets, 98% of it's use would be for porn.
I used to tell a lot of religious jokes. Not any more, I'm a registered sects offender.
--------------- ...the least christian thing a person can do is to become a christian. ~Chuck --------------- NO MA'AM ![[Image: attemptingtogiveadamnc.gif]](https://images.weserv.nl/?url=img824.imageshack.us%2Fimg824%2F7042%2Fattemptingtogiveadamnc.gif)
|
|
« Next Oldest | Next Newest »
|
| Messages In This Thread |
|
Star Trek Science - by Darwinian - August 22, 2009 at 3:39 am
RE: Star Trek Science - by Retorth - August 22, 2009 at 3:45 am
RE: Star Trek Science - by Dotard - August 22, 2009 at 7:53 am
RE: Star Trek Science - by RevOxley - August 22, 2009 at 10:34 am
RE: Star Trek Science - by Tiberius - August 22, 2009 at 10:39 am
RE: Star Trek Science - by Retorth - August 22, 2009 at 10:52 am
RE: Star Trek Science - by Edwardo Piet - August 22, 2009 at 11:39 am
RE: Star Trek Science - by Rhizomorph13 - August 22, 2009 at 12:09 pm
RE: Star Trek Science - by binny - August 22, 2009 at 2:32 pm
RE: Star Trek Science - by Kyuuketsuki - August 22, 2009 at 2:44 pm
RE: Star Trek Science - by Tiberius - August 22, 2009 at 3:11 pm
RE: Star Trek Science - by fr0d0 - August 22, 2009 at 3:21 pm
RE: Star Trek Science - by Rhizomorph13 - August 23, 2009 at 2:06 pm
RE: Star Trek Science - by Darwinian - August 23, 2009 at 2:07 pm
RE: Star Trek Science - by binny - August 23, 2009 at 6:22 pm
RE: Star Trek Science - by fr0d0 - August 23, 2009 at 6:24 pm
RE: Star Trek Science - by binny - August 24, 2009 at 11:30 am
RE: Star Trek Science - by fr0d0 - August 24, 2009 at 1:39 pm
RE: Star Trek Science - by Rob - August 22, 2009 at 3:28 pm
RE: Star Trek Science - by Tiberius - August 22, 2009 at 3:30 pm
RE: Star Trek Science - by fr0d0 - August 22, 2009 at 3:39 pm
RE: Star Trek Science - by Tiberius - August 22, 2009 at 5:58 pm
RE: Star Trek Science - by Edwardo Piet - August 22, 2009 at 6:00 pm
RE: Star Trek Science - by Dotard - August 23, 2009 at 12:02 am
RE: Star Trek Science - by Rob - August 23, 2009 at 10:01 am
RE: Star Trek Science - by Rhizomorph13 - August 23, 2009 at 2:12 pm
RE: Star Trek Science - by Edwardo Piet - August 23, 2009 at 10:02 am
RE: Star Trek Science - by Kyuuketsuki - August 23, 2009 at 10:48 am
RE: Star Trek Science - by Edwardo Piet - August 23, 2009 at 1:04 pm
RE: Star Trek Science - by binny - August 23, 2009 at 1:06 pm
RE: Star Trek Science - by Darwinian - August 23, 2009 at 1:08 pm
RE: Star Trek Science - by Edwardo Piet - August 23, 2009 at 1:09 pm
RE: Star Trek Science - by Dotard - August 23, 2009 at 1:44 pm
RE: Star Trek Science - by Darwinian - August 23, 2009 at 1:45 pm
RE: Star Trek Science - by Edwardo Piet - August 23, 2009 at 6:12 pm
RE: Star Trek Science - by Dotard - August 23, 2009 at 6:38 pm
RE: Star Trek Science - by Edwardo Piet - August 23, 2009 at 6:41 pm
RE: Star Trek Science - by Dotard - August 24, 2009 at 6:16 pm
RE: Star Trek Science - by lilphil1989 - August 26, 2009 at 4:48 am
RE: Star Trek Science - by lilphil1989 - October 5, 2009 at 8:01 am
RE: Star Trek Science - by fr0d0 - October 5, 2009 at 9:24 am
RE: Star Trek Science - by Amphora - October 5, 2009 at 1:40 pm
RE: Star Trek Science - by theblindferrengi - October 5, 2009 at 7:59 pm
RE: Star Trek Science - by binny - October 5, 2009 at 8:02 pm
RE: Star Trek Science - by Dotard - October 6, 2009 at 6:08 am
RE: Star Trek Science - by fr0d0 - October 5, 2009 at 8:22 pm
RE: Star Trek Science - by theblindferrengi - October 5, 2009 at 10:43 pm
RE: Star Trek Science - by fr0d0 - October 6, 2009 at 6:55 am
RE: Star Trek Science - by binny - October 6, 2009 at 11:08 am
|
