(May 1, 2012 at 3:51 pm)jackman Wrote:(May 1, 2012 at 3:38 pm)Welsh cake Wrote:(May 1, 2012 at 3:29 pm)jackman Wrote: i'm also just not sold on the fact that 911 played out the way we're told it was. of that story as told thru the news, there is a valid debunking as there is also a valid debunking of the debunking, just shows in my head that enough questions aren't answered about it. whether you like steven jones' argument (of nanothermite) or bazant's (couldn't have been thermite) - at least there are 2 real studies to read with real info. there is an incredible amount of holes in the story that i can't ignore.If you say the collapse of the WTC twin towers was a controlled demolition I'm putting you on ignore.
hahahaha. how will i live knowing that i'm on ignore? come on man. i expect as much. but i'm asking why that's such a ridiculous notion? as many reports as i've read on it, i'm still not ready to cancel that out as an option. maybe somebody in here will give me more than ridicule, as a reason why they don't believe these thoughts.
tiberius posted a debunking911 site a while ago. massive info. that's the kind of thing that is constructive.
If 911 was a massive US conspiracy, someone would have spoken out, seeming as they have done so for less.
