RE: atheists and "conspiracy" theories
May 1, 2012 at 8:31 pm
(This post was last modified: May 1, 2012 at 8:34 pm by Abishalom.)
(May 1, 2012 at 8:25 pm)padraic Wrote:No actually your argument is a logical fallacy (or perhaps a a sign that you lack comprehension). Both buildings were hit by exactly 1 plane. Hence "A plane will not destroy a 110 story building reinforces with steel and concrete". Now carry on with your nonsense.Quote:Let's be real guys. A plane will not destroy a 110 story building reinforces with steel and concrete
Well actually,TWO planes can,will and did.
Your argument is a based on a logical fallacy called "argument from incredulity/lack of imagination",a form of argument from ignorance..
See my post and videos on the previous page.
0000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000
Quote:Argument from incredulity/Lack of imagination
Arguments from incredulity take the form:
P is too incredible (or: I cannot imagine how P could possibly be true); therefore P must be false.
It is obvious that P is true (or: I cannot imagine how P could possibly be false); therefore P must be true.
These arguments are similar to arguments from ignorance in that they too ignore and do not properly eliminate the possibility that something can be both incredible and still be true, or appear to be obvious and yet still be false.
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Argument_fr...magination
BTW I noticed how you failed to respond to my simple question. A plane hit a building near the top of the building (not its foundation) yet it crumbles IN PLACE (similar to controlled demolition). Please explain...