RE: atheists and "conspiracy" theories
May 1, 2012 at 10:45 pm
(This post was last modified: May 1, 2012 at 10:52 pm by Abishalom.)
(May 1, 2012 at 10:34 pm)Shell B Wrote: Ugh, before the collision, the tower did not collapse because the structure was intact. It's perfectly fucking rational. The unfathomably hot fire fucking demolished anything we could call an infrastructure for several floors, thus compromising the entire structure both above and below it. It got so hot that people several floors away from the impact were goddamn jumping out of the building. Yes, eleven destroyed floors could collapse those beneath them. Eleven intact floors above multiple floors that were also still intact and not damaged by the impact and the subsequent fire, no.Look I perfectly get what you are trying to say. This might be plausible if such conditions were in place. BUT the fire was concentrated at the top. What part of that do you not understand (or are you purposefully ignoring it). Unfathomably hot fire at the top 11-17 floors will not destroy a whole 110 story building.
My house as an example . . . again. Right now, the structure is intact. It holds up the weight of this floor because everything is where it was built to be. If something smacked into my house just right and caused the top floor to fall, it would be much different than the bottom floor holding up the top floor as it was built to be held up, don't you think?