RE: atheists and "conspiracy" theories
May 1, 2012 at 11:04 pm
(This post was last modified: May 1, 2012 at 11:11 pm by Abishalom.)
(May 1, 2012 at 10:51 pm)Shell B Wrote: It was not the top. The fire was concentrated near the top. The infrastructure was severely compromised. What part of that do you not understand? The building was made to withstand an impact, not an impact and a fire of that intensity. If there had been just a gaping hole in the building, it would have continued standing. The structure would have remained intact enough to continue holding the floors beneath the impact. Given that the floors beneath the impact were damaged by the fire, it was nothing at all for the floors above it to continue putting pressure on the compromised structure until it collapsed.It doesn't matter...a fire (fueled by jet fuel) on the top portion of a 110 story building reinforced by steel and concrete. To "severely compromise" the steel used in the WTC you would need the jet fuel to exceed temperatures of 1300-1500 degrees C but jet fuel (the kind on those planes) only burns at around 200-300 degrees C in the open air conditions.
Again, you are ignoring the fact that there is zero evidence for controlled demo beyond conjecture. There were no tell tale flashes or explosions. You can't hide explosions from that many cameras.