atheists and "conspiracy" theories

[Bgood]

@Bgood
Wow..., I don't think you understood one word I said. It wasn't the fire which melted the inner column. It was pure heat(more like an explosion from within the building is a better way to describe it) from the impact:jet fuel+heat+kinetic energy = very bad day.

What evidence do you have that would stand up in even an "unbiased" as you would say, court of law?

I have WAY too much evidence, you'll look it up yourself.

This doesn't explain WTC7. And what is the difference between 'pure heat' and fire? Isn't the heat caused from the fire.

You also say:

It was pure heat(more like an explosion from within the building is a better way to describe it) Oh... like an explosive. I get it.