Excuse me?
If you don't want to read it, it's your problem, not mine. So don't you dare go on about things when you've refused to read what I've said to you.
1) A *section* of the wiki page that showed a table to distinguish between the fact of evolution and the theory of evolution in comparison to the fact of gravity and the theory of gravity.
2) A picture of the Hubble Ultra Deep field that I thought you might want to have a look at. You didn't have to read the whole article, but it didn't seem right to talk for a paragraph about the ultra deep field without at least linking to the picture of it.
3) The page for a book I suggested you read. I could have linked to the book website I supposed, but to be honest the wiki page was there and I didn't think you'd be such a moron to make a fuss out of a few links. I do apologise.
My "version of arguing" involved me spending a good 10 minutes writing responses to your points. These points were all thought up by myself, and only an arrogant cunt would spot 3 reference links and claim I was "arguing by posting wiki links".
So now that you've refused to read anything I've written, I'll expect nothing more from you in this entire thread. Unless of course, you want to be a hypocrite!
If you don't want to read it, it's your problem, not mine. So don't you dare go on about things when you've refused to read what I've said to you.
Quote:especially if you're version of arguing is posting wiki linksFUCK...YOU! If you'd bothered to read my post instead of skimming over it as you evidently did, you would have seen that the wiki links I used were:
1) A *section* of the wiki page that showed a table to distinguish between the fact of evolution and the theory of evolution in comparison to the fact of gravity and the theory of gravity.
2) A picture of the Hubble Ultra Deep field that I thought you might want to have a look at. You didn't have to read the whole article, but it didn't seem right to talk for a paragraph about the ultra deep field without at least linking to the picture of it.
3) The page for a book I suggested you read. I could have linked to the book website I supposed, but to be honest the wiki page was there and I didn't think you'd be such a moron to make a fuss out of a few links. I do apologise.
My "version of arguing" involved me spending a good 10 minutes writing responses to your points. These points were all thought up by myself, and only an arrogant cunt would spot 3 reference links and claim I was "arguing by posting wiki links".
So now that you've refused to read anything I've written, I'll expect nothing more from you in this entire thread. Unless of course, you want to be a hypocrite!
