Quote:YOU DO NOT POSSESS ANY DIRECT EVIDENCE THAT YOU WERE EVER BORN ... YOU DON'T EVEN REMEMBER IT!Can there only be "direct evidence" of things we remember? I am not the one saying I have direct evidence of the beginning of the universe.
My only point is that the big bang theory is theory. Apparently in science theory means "not a doubt in the world", whereas I thought it meant an idea based on available evidence that is either not provable, or not disprovable.
Adrian, I mean it when I say I don't want these things to turn personal. I know you wrote the parts between wiki links, but you also know how much I dislike them. I am almost assured to have read any wiki link you post, that is why.
I know there is evidence that we fit to the theory of the big bang, but if the common theory changed, the evidence would too. They had evidence heat was a liquid, but when it turned out not to be, the evidence was seen in a different light.
I maintain, my only point is that there is a possibility the universe started in a different way than proposed in the big bang theory. Not that it did, but only that it could have.
Thank you.
-Pip
