RE: Shepherds –> Bulls –> Judges -> Angels -> gods -> God !!
May 4, 2012 at 4:31 am
(This post was last modified: May 4, 2012 at 4:32 am by Reforged.)
Read through it all. Could easily have been shortened as some parts aren't needed to back-up point.
Also "First Shepherds ever were the gods.". If this is the case then "Gods –> Gods –> Gods -> Gods -> gods -> God !!" or "The Many faces of God" would be a more accurate title. The fact they were depicted as Shepherds, Bulls or whatever doesn't change the fact that they were still seen as God like entities. Your current title is misleading in that most people who read it would think the article explains the misconceptions that lead to the concept of a God being formulated and that concepts journey into the more PR friendly "Gods" of today. Thats certainly what I gathered from the title.
However, this isn't to say this article isn't interesting. It simply needs to be trimmed down as there are alot of elaborations that are not required. Your message gets lost in them.
Also "First Shepherds ever were the gods.". If this is the case then "Gods –> Gods –> Gods -> Gods -> gods -> God !!" or "The Many faces of God" would be a more accurate title. The fact they were depicted as Shepherds, Bulls or whatever doesn't change the fact that they were still seen as God like entities. Your current title is misleading in that most people who read it would think the article explains the misconceptions that lead to the concept of a God being formulated and that concepts journey into the more PR friendly "Gods" of today. Thats certainly what I gathered from the title.
However, this isn't to say this article isn't interesting. It simply needs to be trimmed down as there are alot of elaborations that are not required. Your message gets lost in them.
"That is not dead which can eternal lie and with strange aeons even death may die."
- Abdul Alhazred.
- Abdul Alhazred.
