Well you know exactly what constitutes hard rational evidence from JP's thread. What I always assume you're meaning is verifiable evidence, as we can never seem to get past that one in our discussions. Possibly because you insist on spamming a discussion so badly with posts impossible to read because of the crazy repetition. I make progressive points, and so do others, to be countered by a copy posting almost of your previous post. That isn't discussion. That's bland child play.
After JP's succinct rational presentation I feel there's nothing more to say on the reasoning front. It's all been said, and not refuted. So we await your champion, or someone who can at least present one grain of reasoning against.
After JP's succinct rational presentation I feel there's nothing more to say on the reasoning front. It's all been said, and not refuted. So we await your champion, or someone who can at least present one grain of reasoning against.
