(May 18, 2012 at 11:03 pm)Polaris Wrote: Since when does "take with a grain of salt" mean the same as saying something is "worth a grain of salt?"
Because you mention this:
(May 18, 2012 at 11:03 pm)Polaris Wrote: I was just suspicious of the reasons behind it. On whether they were actually honest about their intentions since governments tend to be so honest /sarcasm.
Which implies that, based on your characterization of long-dead men's honesty, said treaty was passed disingenuously and thus is an illegal, unjust legislation.
You can't have it both ways -- playing victim while suggesting precisely that the Treaty of Tripoli was passed in a way that invalidates such via intention et al.
Slave to the Patriarchy no more