(May 23, 2012 at 10:46 am)FallentoReason Wrote:(May 23, 2012 at 10:38 am)Phil Wrote: So it is a modern spin on someones numerology which is what I said. Thought you were going to be an engineer? You mean critical thinking is optional?
I don't understand your point exactly. What I understand less is why you're making a big deal out of a percentage error of .06% i.e. negligible for argument's sake as opposed to possibly reacting in any way when presented the idea that Lux-Axe was written by a Pagan historian. What's more important here?
My point is my incredible disgust that an engineering student that thinks numerological woo is valid. Anyway, the reason I am addressing the numbers is simply because they are wrong (and most of the argument hinges on them being correct) and the methodology used is a well known wooish technique. The error is not .06% and the fact that you as an engineering student thinks that it is a valid calculation is extremely scary to me.
