RE: Hey Everyone.
August 30, 2009 at 2:11 pm
(This post was last modified: August 30, 2009 at 2:14 pm by fr0d0.)
(August 30, 2009 at 1:29 pm)Kyuuketsuki Wrote:Well as it's them you're pulling up, and their belief you're addressing, I'd personally think it wasn't up to you, unless you have some belief you're not telling us about??(August 30, 2009 at 1:24 pm)fr0d0 Wrote:(August 30, 2009 at 1:17 pm)Samson Wrote: I personally do not believe Science will be able to prove there is no god, just as much as the religious in trying to prove there is...
Idiots try to prove the existence of God. Religion specifically states that there can't be verifiable proof
But that religion states it as so doesn't mean it is correct.
Kyu
(August 30, 2009 at 1:37 pm)Minimalist Wrote:Quote:Religion specifically states that there can't be verifiable proof.
Again, how convenient for the guy who has no proof.
LOL at the blind ignorance in your statement
(August 30, 2009 at 1:39 pm)Darwinian Wrote: How about the paradox between omnipotence and omniscience?Who's that aimed at Darwinian? Of course I've said before.. you're assuming a deity existant in time to make that stick. As the Christian God is understood/ defined to exist outside of time, that doeasn't apply.
An omniscient god knows everything. Therefore he can never change his mind, have a new idea, be surprised etc.
However, if he is also omnipotent he can do anything including these things. If he cannot do these things he is not omnipotent and yet if he can then he can't be omniscient.
Either/or but not both.
