Beside the point. My main argument is the employment of logic or the preference for science is just that, a personal preference and it needs no outside justification, same as saying "I like strawberry ice cream".
TAG and presuppositional apologetics are attempts to manufacture a problem that doesn't exist so that they can then offer a contrived definition of "God" as the "solution" (even though it isn't a very meaningful solution) so they can arrive at their predetermined conclusion.
TAG and presuppositional apologetics are attempts to manufacture a problem that doesn't exist so that they can then offer a contrived definition of "God" as the "solution" (even though it isn't a very meaningful solution) so they can arrive at their predetermined conclusion.
Atheist Forums Hall of Shame:
"The trinity can be equated to having your cake and eating it too."
... -Lucent, trying to defend the Trinity concept
"(Yahweh's) actions are good because (Yahweh) is the ultimate standard of goodness. That’s not begging the question"
... -Statler Waldorf, Christian apologist
"The trinity can be equated to having your cake and eating it too."
... -Lucent, trying to defend the Trinity concept
"(Yahweh's) actions are good because (Yahweh) is the ultimate standard of goodness. That’s not begging the question"
... -Statler Waldorf, Christian apologist
