(June 2, 2012 at 4:01 am)FallentoReason Wrote: The thing with the video my friend showed me is that their argument is that time wasn't constant in the beginning.
Because the simple explanation of why the universe is so old relies on the equation
time = distance/speed
it means that if time wasn't constant then that changes the outcome of the equation to a possibly wrong answer, just like if the speed of light wasn't always constant (which I think it always has). Either way I'll check out the 5 videos and see what their arguments are.
That is silly as time/space (distance) are part of the same matrix, and there is no consistent theory or evidence of non-isotopic change between the dimensions of space time with the evolution of the universe. Except to assume they were for some reason dissociated then re-associated again later (here's the important part) FOR NO REASON. That is, equivalent to assuming the stars aren't there at that time but their photons are. Silly.
"Listen, strange women lying in ponds distributing swords is no basis for a system of government! Supreme executive power derives from a mandate by the masses, not some farcical aquatic ceremony!"
- Dennis the peasant.
- Dennis the peasant.
