Another Lying Catholic Fuck Gets Caught

[Aiza]

The church has chosen to deal with the matter under canon law INSTEAD of involving the authorities, AS POLICY,a clear breach of civil law.

No they haven't. And I'm not stupid, you are being very ignorant here. The two are not mutually exclusive and in fact, canon law requires it be reported to authorities per the standards of the nation in question anyway.

Where a crime has been committed, not reporting it to the civil authorities is a a breach of civil law,which has also happened for centuries under the seal of confession,in which church claims a non-existent right under canon law.

They claim a right of religious freedom, and its not a breach of civil law in any nation which respects religious freedom. Also confessions are anonymous anyway.

For goodness sake read the book. Perhaps then you may make fewer risibly stupid comments.

If the book is saying that "AS POLICY" the Church "chooses to deal with the matter under canon law INSTEAD of involving the authorities" then the book is wrong. Its just another book in a long line of really ignorant anti-Catholic books that bigots love to take seriously without actually looking things up on their own. Did you read the actual canon law, for goodness sake?

Also I'm still waiting on that ONE sexual abuser you can name who was "dealt with" under canon law but where the authorities were not involved at all. If its being done for "centuries" as you say, you should be able to name at least one right? In the last 100 years or so? No?

Its sort of funny because I can name plenty of cases where the secular authorities were alerted but not the Vatican--including the story in this very OP. Funny how that works.

And again this is all totally irrelevant because here he was paying to remove people faster and saving money which is exactly what SNAP has traditionally wanted. None of it has anything to do with canon law and its perfectly in compliance with civil law as well, as shown by the fact its done in pubic school districts.