The Ararat Anomaly is just that, an anomaly. It currently has no explanation, and nobody has gone up and found the site to determine what is it yet. How an unknown can be used as evidence for some mythological story is quite beyond me.
Go to the mountain, find Noah's Ark (the actual remains, not just some photo of a weird shape), and then we'll talk about the possibility of the flood being real. Of course, you'd also have to explain why none of the geological column bears any markings of a global flood, and all the other reasons why it is an impossibility.
Sunken cities prove that the cities sunk, they do not reveal anything about any godly cause.
It seems a rather good place to remind you that you must provide evidence with your claims in future. A link to the investigation website or a news article will suffice, but please provide it. You are the one with the claim; it is up to you to provide the evidence.
Go to the mountain, find Noah's Ark (the actual remains, not just some photo of a weird shape), and then we'll talk about the possibility of the flood being real. Of course, you'd also have to explain why none of the geological column bears any markings of a global flood, and all the other reasons why it is an impossibility.
Sunken cities prove that the cities sunk, they do not reveal anything about any godly cause.
It seems a rather good place to remind you that you must provide evidence with your claims in future. A link to the investigation website or a news article will suffice, but please provide it. You are the one with the claim; it is up to you to provide the evidence.
