Hey Everyone.

[Tiberius]

OK sure Adrian. But you cant write something off because of its name. I mean if someone's name is "Stupid" that doesn't mean the person is stupid... So it is the case with the ararat anomaly.

It is called an "anomaly" for a reason. UFO's are called UFO's for a reason (they are unidentified!). Why would someone name it an anomaly unless they wanted to make sure people that it was that; an anomaly. If it is called an anomaly, it is an anomaly; quite simply. Bringing up people's names is not helping your point; they aren't descriptions of the person. However we do all have another name: "Human being" which is very descriptive of us all.

OK, how else would you explain it? Exact dimensions of Noah's ark, top of Ararat.....

You claim it is "exact" dimensions yet nobody has stated it's dimensions. All people have said is it is 6 times longer than it is wide. The photos are grainy, and no expedition has been there, meaning we have no idea how deep it goes (if it is an object rather than a oddly shaped mountain) or even how long it is (considering it could be buried under the snow).

And there ARE proofs of the flood. Fossilised remains of sea-living creatures have been found on top of mountains....

Continental drift (which has also been proven by science by the way) explains these easily. Mountains are formed by the collision of two continental plates, and mountains at these sites are increasing in height all the time. Mount Everest "grows" by 2 inches every year. Fossils from Oceanic plates are pushed up the mountain by the collision. I learned this when I was your age in a Georgraphy class; it is a shame you didn't. Plate tectonics is a fascinating subject.

I know that you may interpret the data in the way that you like best (I'm not denying that I may be doing the same), but to me those three are proofs enough of a Biblical flood.

I don't interpret data in a way I like best. I interpret the results by experimentation and observation. Experiments have shown us that mountains are getting higher, and plates are colliding. Our entire understanding of volcanoes and earthquakes relies on plate tectonics, and it has enabled us to build early warning systems to help save lives.

So what other evidence have you got? Also, why doesn't the geological column show the clear flood that it should have done. All major floods leave evidence in the columns, namely a layer of strata that contains larger objects at the bottom, and smaller objects at the top. A global flood (arguably the most "major" flood ever) would have left a massive layer, and quite near the top too considering it apparently happened 4,000 years ago. No such layer exists.

Sunken cities, right, so how the hell did they get so covered in salt? And its not an island, its two sunken cities in the middle of mountainous terrain.

Again, you do not provide any evidence. Please provide evidence of these sites. Then I will answer your questions.