Origin of Articles

[The Grand Nudger]

You still haven't given a valid reason why science should work in your personal evolutionary worldview.
You have no reason to believe any given experiment would produce the same result in the future as it has in the past.

You're taking for granted the law of uniformity upheld by our creator. Gen 8:22 for example.

Good luck because your peers haven't.

Any other response to this post that doesn't address this issue would just continue to prove my point.

At what point am I required to do so? Why it should or shouldn't work has very little bearing on the fact that it does.

We do actually have a mountain of reasons to assume that a given experiment with identical variables will return similar or identical results. That's one of the requirements of the scientific method btw (and you should know that if you're going to argue against it, shouldn't you). You report your activities to your peers and they then attempt to replicate both the experiment and the findings. However, there is always the caveat of provisional certitude which does allow for everything to mysteriously stop working at any point -however improbable. When satellites fall out of the sky you go ahead and inform us.

Your creator upholds nothing unless you can demonstrate that it exists in the first place. A before b.