(June 12, 2012 at 8:13 am)Faith No More Wrote:Brian37 Wrote:
Wow. Your response is so full of red herrings and refutations to points I never made that I feel I must summarize the point I am actually trying to make, so it will be impossible for you to misconsture what I have to say, unless of course you are willfully being obtuse.
Insulting people is detrimental to getting them to change their beliefs.
Says you.
"Ridicule is the only weapon which can be used against unintelligible propositions" THOMAS JEFFERSON.
I have given you multiple examples of why it can be, NOT ALWAYS, but can be a useful tool.
Again, when people talk in terms of ANY blanket solution, ON ANY SUBJECT, not just this, but anything, you set yourself up for stagnation.
If I told you to always "ridicule" in every context no matter what, that is a form of dogmatism and would be just as wrong as what you are suggesting here.
I failed basic training, you want to know why? Not because I couldn't do it, I actually loved the physical stuff, but because I was to young to understand what they were trying to do to me. From 5 am to 10 pm I was shouted at and felt like a piece of shit, but feeling like a piece of shit was my own fault and lack of understanding of the situation and the intent of it. Simply put I was not emotionally prepared. They were trying to get me to get over my fear and be unafraid.
WHICH IS WHY I tell any theist if they are not comfortable in the boxing ring DONT JUMP IN. I had no business back then getting involved in something I was not prepared for.
I like you are falsely accusing me of, took what the Drill Instructors did as personal, rather than a test.
You cripple people by handing the emotional crutch of a taboo especially the minorities with this good intent.
I don't know how more clear I can make it. It is a matter of context and comfort level, not absolutes, not for them, not for us.
If I say "Don't take it personally" then why shouldn't that be enough? And what right does that person have after I say that and after they still engage to continue to make demands when the choice is on them.
I want to debate theists and I don't mind the heat, and like I said before, you falsely assume that everyone who gets offended, has a glass jaw. If that is the case I would never debate someone who equated me to Hitler for being an atheist.
What most people do is falsely treat there claims as being them, when claims are not people, but what people claim. If people would learn to separate the two they would know they should not be taking it personally and do not have to be afraid of merely being offended.
Stick to your own comfort level and don't assume all theists cant handle me or cant like me because of my tactic.